[kreationisterna hävdar] att vetenskapen bara är ett slags löst tyckande, inte mer vederhäftig än mellanösterländska getaherdars hallucinationer för 2000 år sedan.

Faran från kreationisterna kan inte nog inskärpas. Ur varje ståndpunkt: moralisk, vetenskaplig och samhällelig är detta en rörelse som är fullständigt rutten. Efter att ha förnedrats med rätta i offentligheten är deras målsättning mer och mer att verka parallellt med samhällsinstitutionerna och underminera och om möjlighet erbjuds infiltrera det sekulära samhällets centrala institutioner.

The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation. During the minute it takes me to compose this sentence, thousands of animals are being eaten alive; others are running for their lives, whimpering with fear; others are being slowly devoured from within by rasping parasites; thousands of all kinds are dying of starvation, thirst and disease.

Infinitarian paralysis threatens a wide range of popular ethical theories. Consider, to begin with, hedonistic utilitarianism, which in its classical formulation states that you ought to do that which maximizes the total amount of pleasure and minimizes the total amount of pain in the world. If pleasure and pain are already infinite, then all possible actions you could take would be morally on a par according to this criterion, for none of them would make any difference to the total amount of pleasure or pain. Endorsing this form of utilitarianism commits one to the view that, conditional on the world being canonically infinite, ending world hunger and causing a famine are ethically equivalent options. It is not the case that you ought to do one rather than the other.

The threat is not limited to hedonistic utilitarianism. Utilitarian theories that have a broader conception of the good—happiness, preference-satisfaction, virtue, beauty-appreciation, or some objective list of ingredients that make for a good life — face the same problem. So, too, does average utilitarianism, mixed total/average utilitarianism, and prioritarian views that place a premium on the well-being of the worst off. In a canonically infinite world, average utility and most weighted utility measures are just as imperturbable by human agency as is the simple sum of utility.